Bell and Swan v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtRobins, J.
Appellants ask ns to reverse the circuit court’s judgment by which it was ordered that seven slot machines belonging to appellant Swan and 20 slot machines belonging to appellant Bell be destroyed.
It is conceded that all these slot machines were gambling devices. Some of them, when seized, contained coins, showing they had been in actual use. No question is raised as to the validity of the search warrants under which they were seized by the sheriff. The slot machines owned by Swan were found in his warehouse. Bell’s slot machines were seized in a room at the-rear of Hopper’s barber shop.
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frost v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- J. B. Mullen & Co. v. MoseleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
- Albright v. MuncriefSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Howell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Garland Novelty Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. 192 Coin-Operated Video Game MacHinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- State v. 26 Gaming MacHinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Burnside v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Prendergast v. DwyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.