Legal Opinion

Albright v. Muncrief

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1943No. 4-7248PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellee, on August 12, 1943, by appropriate action, sought to recover two teletype machines. He alleged, in his complaint, that appellants, members of the Arkansas State Police, without proper search and seizure warrant, entered his place of business in the city of Hot Springs and unlawfully seized the machines in question, in violation of his constitutional rights "as set forth in Amendment No. 4 and Amendment No. 14 of the Constitution of the United States and in art. 2, 15 of the Constitution of the State of Arkansas." He further alleged that the machines were not subject to seizure.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Glennon v. BrittonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Albright v. KarstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  5. State Ex Rel. Merrell v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gerard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Dunn v. Nevada Tax CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. 26 Gaming MacHinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Blankenship v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. Bostic v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API