Legal Opinion

Fudickar v. Inabnet

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 27, 1933No. 32007PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Justice.

Plaintiff is the holder of a note for $2,400 signed by the Jordan Drilling Company. Subsequent to the maturity of the note, pursuant to the written agreement of its seven directors and stockholders, an extrajudicial liquidation of the drilling company was effectuated, and the entire assets of the corporation were distributed -among the stockholders. Each of the,stockholders received property valued in an amount exceeding plaintiff’s claim. The agreement of the directors and stockholders provided for the appointment of a liquidator clothed with the authority to distribute the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wood v. DummerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1824
  2. Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Dilzell Engineering & Construction Co. v. LehmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  4. Brown v. Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
  5. Tanneret v. Merchants' Mutual Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Clasen v. Excel Finance Causeway, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Fly v. HandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Shreveport Sash & Door Company v. RayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Ortego v. Nehi Bottling WorksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Dooley v. WrightLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API