Legal Opinion

Ortego v. Nehi Bottling Works

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 3, 1938No. 5641PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Judge.

Damages are claimed by plaintiffs in this suit because of the alleged explosion on July 6, 1936, with resultant injury, of a bottle of carbonated beverage.

The original' petition, which was filed March 11, 1937, impleaded as defendants the Nehi Bottling Works, and Thomas H. Stanley as sole owner and proprietor of that company, and alleged that they had succeeded to all of the assets and liabilities of the Nehi Bottling Company, Incorporated, which prepared and delivered the above mentioned beverage. To this petition exceptions of non-joinder and mis-joinder of parties defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fudickar v. InabnetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Brown v. Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
  3. McCoy v. State Line Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Walling v. James v. Reuter, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Ortego v. Nehi Bottling WorksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  3. Jeannette Lenkin v. District of Columbia, Morris Pollin v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. Radermacher v. DanielsIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Dooley v. WrightLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API