Legal Opinion
Walton v. Walton
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 5, 1964No. 22355PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Justice.
It is a familiar rule that a trial judge’s grant of temporary alimony in a divorce case will be disturbed only where he flagrantly abused his discretion. Swearingen v. Swearingen, 19 Ga. 265 (3); Etheridge v. Etheridge, 149 Ga. 44 (1) (99 SE 37); Golden v. Golden, 209 Ga. 915 (76 SE2d 697). Where the evidence is in conflict, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed. Walden v. Walden, 151 Ga. 549 (1) (107 SE 483); Drake v. Drake, 182 Ga. 324 (185 SE 327); Stanton v. Stanton, 213 Ga. 545, 552 (100 SE2d 289, 66 ALR2d 1401). With this in mind, we now review each of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Carlton v. CarltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- McGee v. McGeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Hannah v. HannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hewlett v. HewlettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Carson v. CarsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- McNally v. McNallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Ritchea v. RitcheaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.