Stimpson Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. PAM Trading Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GREENE, Judge.
Plaintiff Stimpson Hosiery Mills, Inc. (“plaintiff”), appeals a jury’s counterclaim verdict for defendants PAM Trading Corporation and Officine Savio Matee, S.p.A. (“defendants”). Defendants appeal the jury verdict for plaintiff and denial of defendants’ motions for new trial, judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and remittitur.
Plaintiff is a corporation that manufactures women’s hosiery. Defendants PAM and Matee are corporations which respectively manufacture and sell a brand of hosiery knitting machine, Veloce. Defendants placed a Veloce knitting machine in plaintiff’s plant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Carawan v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Millis Construction Co. v. Fairfield Sapphire Valley, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Smith v. Independent Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Brooks v. GoodenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jones v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Smith v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- City of Statesville v. CloaningerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Colorado Bankers Life Insurance Company v. Academy Financial Assets, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.