Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tim Osicka

¶ 31. (concurring). I join the per curiam opinion.

¶ 32. Although Attorney Osicka's repeated violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys in the present case are not the most horrific the court *668has encountered, Attorney Osicka did harm his clients. (And this is not the first time. Attorney Osicka is a repeat offender.) His clients have registered complaints and they want to be assured that this court's lawyer discipline system cares about them as victims of an attorney's misconduct and that the court will provide the victims with relief.

¶ 33. Victims do not expect the court to…