Ingram v. Department of Licensing
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Chambers, J.
Two men challenge the 90-day suspensions of their driver’s licenses under the State’s implied *517consent law, RCW 46.20.308. They contend that their respective hearing officers should not have admitted a form declaration by the state toxicologist. We reject their arguments, reverse the trial court, and reinstate their 90-day suspensions.
BACKGROUND
¶2 For decades, the Washington State Legislature has engaged in an ever-expanding effort to eliminate or reduce the carnage intoxicated drivers wreak upon the people and highways of the State. This effort began in 1927, when Washington…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cannon v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Thompson v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Thompson v. State Dept. of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Silverstreak, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF LABORWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Silverstreak, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- ZDI Gaming, Inc. v. Washington State Gambling CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Washington State Communication Access Project v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Tomlinson v. Puget Sound Freight LinesWashington Supreme Court · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.