Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Department of Licensing

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2007No. 80149-5PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Chambers, J.

Two men challenge the 90-day suspensions of their driver’s licenses under the State’s implied *517consent law, RCW 46.20.308. They contend that their respective hearing officers should not have admitted a form declaration by the state toxicologist. We reject their arguments, reverse the trial court, and reinstate their 90-day suspensions.

BACKGROUND

¶2 For decades, the Washington State Legislature has engaged in an ever-expanding effort to eliminate or reduce the carnage intoxicated drivers wreak upon the people and highways of the State. This effort began in 1927, when Washington…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cannon v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Thompson v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Thompson v. State Dept. of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Silverstreak, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF LABORWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Silverstreak, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. ZDI Gaming, Inc. v. Washington State Gambling CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Washington State Communication Access Project v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Tomlinson v. Puget Sound Freight LinesWashington Supreme Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API