Legal Opinion
Department of Health Services of Los Angeles Cty. v. Civil Serv. Comm'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 23, 1993No. Docket Nos. B062074, B066174PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
In these consolidated appeals, we are asked to construe two Los Angeles County Civil Service Rules. These rules provide procedures for “progressive discipline,” and ultimately for the discharge of county employees who do not perform satisfactorily in their employment and who fail to improve their performance after warnings.
The real parties in interest 2 contend that rule 20.04, subdivision (A)(4) and (A)(5), read together, require that: (1) if an employee is given an “improvement needed” performance evaluation under subdivision (a)(4) and placed on a six-month program for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McAllister v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Shoemaker v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Riley v. Hilton Hotels CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Acapulco Restaurants, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Dobbins v. San Diego County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.