Pure Oil Co. v. Swindall
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHORT, Presiding Judge.
There are two applications for the writ of error granted in this case, one by the Pure Oil Company and its assignors, and the other , by R. L. Wells, one of the original defendants. The application of the Pure Oil Company and its assignors was granted on the second assignment of error in its application, which is to the effect that the Court of Civil Appeals erred in its opinion in holding that the doctrine of innocent purchaser for value would not be applicable to the Pure Oil Company, and to the other plaintiffs in error, in the application, as a defense to the suit…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eylar v. EylarTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Steffian v. Milmo National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Schneider v. SellersTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Graves v. KinneyTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Link v. PageTexas Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Dyson Descendant Corp. v. Sonat Exploration Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
- Strong v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Durkay v. Madco Oil Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
- Dixon v. KaufmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Kunkel v. KunkelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.