Legal Opinion

Dyson Descendant Corp. v. Sonat Exploration Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 31, 1993No. 01-92-00054-CVPublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OLIVER-PARROTT, Chief Justice.

Dyson Descendant Corporation, Larry Dyson, and Martin White (the plaintiffs) appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The plaintiffs assert a right of reverter or an ownership interest in the mineral estate claimed by one of the defendants, Sonat Minerals, Inc., because the Whiting and Runnells deeds underlying the defendants’ title are allegedly void. The trial court found no merit in the plaintiffs’ assertion and imposed sanctions against them and their attorney, finding that their cause of action had no basis in law or fact.

We hold the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. MMP, Ltd. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Save Our Springs Alliance, Inc. v. Lazy Nine Municipal Utility District Ex Rel. Board of Directors, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  2. Falk & Mayfield L.L.P. v. Molzan, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  3. Morris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  4. Tarrant County v. ChanceyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Woodward v. Jaster, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API