Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 30, 1974No. [No. 248, September Term, 1973.]PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

The appellants bring this appeal contending that the trial judge, in this jury case, committed error when he allowed the appellees leave to amend their pleadings to include claims for rent, which had accrued from the institution of this suit to the day of trial. 1 In support of their efforts to obtain a reversal, appellants reason that because a suit for rent involves an independent cause of action in assumpsit for each rental payment as it becomes due, the monthly rent obligations which have accrued in this instance subsequent to the institution of suit cannot be appended to it. This is so,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town of Somerset v. Montgomery County Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Hall v. Barlow CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Cook v. Alexandria National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Preissman v. HarmatzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Martin v. CarlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. RRC Northeast, LLC v. BAA Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Minh-Vu Hoang v. Hewitt Avenue Associates, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Schmerling v. Injured Workers' Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Klupt v. KrongardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API