Legal Opinion
Klupt v. Krongard
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 28, 1999No. 405, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THIEME, Judge.
On November 18, 1997, the Circuit Court for Baltimore County (Turnbull, J.) entered a final judgment dismissing the seven-count counterclaim of Carle Klupt and his company, Sharbar, Inc. (The appellants), against a group of named counter-defendants (the appellees), for breach of contract, fraud, negligent misrepresentations, breach of fiduciary duty, and legal malpractice, in association with the licensing and production of the appellants’ invention of a disposable videocassette. The court acted after finding that Klupt had willfully and contumaciously acted with the specific…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,745 Dean Woods, and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Covington County Bank, Edward Hoglund v. Covington County BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Turner v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Torres v. El Paso Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Pak v. HoangCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Stephen Slesinger, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Randolph v. PowerComm Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Sindler v. LitmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.