Commonwealth v. Wideman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANDERINO, Justice.
This is a direct appeal from a judgment of sentence following a jury verdict of murder in the second degree entered against appellant, Julius Wideman, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia.
Appellant argues that the trial court committed reversible error when, over objection, it allowed Police Detective John Smith to testify concerning a certain oral inculpatory statement made in his presence by the appellant. Appellant contends that this statement should have been excluded because the prosecution failed to demonstrate that appellant’s police interrogators had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harrison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth. v. HossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Commonwealth v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- DeJesus v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.