Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Scott

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 2000No. 266 Capital Appeal DocketPublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIGRO, Justice.

Following a bench trial, Appellant Nathan Scott was convicted of first-degree murder and related offenses 1 on September 16, 1998. On September 18, 1998, following a penalty phase hearing, the trial court determined that the one aggravating circumstance 2 it found outweighed the two mitigating circumstances 3 it found and, therefore, imposed a sentence of death. Appellant filed post-trial motions, which the trial court denied. The instant appeal followed. 4

Though Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court is required to independently review…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. GribbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. FletcherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth. v. HossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. PuksarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BriggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. SneedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. BusanetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. SteeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. PaddySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API