Legal Opinion

Mendelsohn v. Leather Manufacturing Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 6, 1950PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

To a better understanding of the objectives of this bill in equity a description of the parties and a recital of some of the facts will be helpful. The activities of the following corporations, in one way or another, are involved in this litigation: Leather Manufacturing Company (hereinafter called Company), Plastics Specialties Corporation (hereinafter called Plastics), Leather Sales Company (hereinafter called Sales), and Leather Manufacturing Corporation (hereinafter called Corporation). 1 Of these only Corporation, as a defendant, is a party to this suit. The other defendants are B.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Durfee v. Durfee & Canning, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Commonwealth v. BorisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Wilkes v. Springside Nursing Home, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Masinter v. Webco Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Cardullo v. LandauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  5. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc. v. George P. Mitchell, George P. Mitchell v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API