Legal Opinion

Consolidated Manufacturing, Inc. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 8, 2001No. 98-9027PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

This case involves financial accounting issues in the context of income taxation. Consolidated Manufacturing purchases used car parts, called “cores,” rebuilds the cores with new components, and then sells them. Consolidated uses a pricing system that encourages its customers for the rebuilt products to send a replacement core back to it. In this way, Consolidated ensures a continuous supply of its primary raw material — the cores. The price that the company agrees to pay its customers for such replacement cores is called the “core amount” (referred to herein as “core…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Adrian Freeman v. Laventhol & HorwathCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. D. Loveman & Son Export Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
  4. Peter Mamula and Dorothy R. Mamula v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. Hutzler Bros. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frank Thomas v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Lovejoy v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  3. Van Scoten v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. JPMorgan Chase & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  5. IHC Health Plans, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API