Legal Opinion

Adrian Freeman v. Laventhol & Horwath

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 17, 1990No. 89-6259PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMBERS, Circuit Judge:

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order entered April 13, 1989, in the Eastern District of Kentucky, William 0. Bertels-man, District Judge, denying appellants’ motion for partial summary judgment, or, in the alternative, to dismiss appellees’ claims of fraud on the new issue market.

This class action arises from the sale of tax-exempt municipal bonds to finance the construction of a retirement center. The complaint alleges violations of various state and federal securities laws. Our concern, on this appeal, is limited to appellees’ allegations of securities fraud…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. Cammer v. BloomDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  2. Miles v. Merrill Lynch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Frances Unger, William Patterson, Lead Gordon Ellis, Lead v. Amedisys Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  5. Robert Eckstein v. Balcor Film InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API