Legal Opinion

Insurance Commissioner v. Property & Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 31, 1988No. 102, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

This case involves claims for Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits filed by a number of individuals under policies issued to them by two now insolvent insurance companies. Minimum benefits of $2,500 for PIP coverage are required in every policy of motor vehicle liability insurance issued in Maryland. Coverage includes medical, hospital, wage loss, and disability benefits for the named insured and other designated persons injured in a motor vehicle accident; the benefits are payable without regard to fault, and without regard to any collateral source of medical,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. A. S. Abell Publishing Co. v. MezzanoteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. SchlossbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Sands v. Pa. Ins. Guaranty Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Bridges v. NicelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Oglesby v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. DeVane v. KennedyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Dutta v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Carrozza v. GreenbaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API