Frost v. Milwaukee & Northern Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Menominee. (Stone, J.). Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Plaintiffs were lumbermen, and at the time of the accident complained of they had several teams hauling logs from the east across the defendant’s track to> the Michigamme river. The crossing was constructed by the defendant in the usual manner, for the sole convenience of the plaintiffs, and was known as the “Frost & Murphy Crossing.” Plaintiffs kept three or four men upon their logging road to keep it covered with snow, and, as the witnesses expressed it, “in good slipping condition.” On the 14th day of February, 1890, Gould, one of plaintiff’s teamsters, with a team of four horses and a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Denman v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by11 opinions
- Riley v. WaltersMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Redson v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Mertz v. Detroit Electric RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Patton v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Kotila v. Houghton County Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.