Legal Opinion

Day v. Celoria Et Ux.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

The learned circuit judge sustained tbe demurrer on authority of the case of State Land Board v. Lee, 84 Or. 431 (165 Pac. 372). That case involved only one question, namely: Whether or not the statute of limitations applied to the State Land Board. Section 9890 was not in force when that case was submitted to this court. It was properly held in that case that it did not because the state was the real party in interest. The statute is not operative against a demand of the state.

Mr. Justice Bean in Hydraulic Mining Co. v. Smith, 100 Or. 86, 104 (196 Pac. 811) strongly intimates that payments…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Land Board v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Hydraulic Mining Co. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Security State Bank v. LuebkeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Title & Trust Co. v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. WITHERS v. ReedOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Force v. HeusnerOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Zanietta v. McCullochOregon Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API