Legal Opinion

Zanietta v. McCulloch

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.

Section 9887, Or. L., provides:

“No mortgage upon real estate now, heretofore or hereafter given, shall be a lien or incumbrance, or of any effect or validity for any purpose whatsoever, after the expiration of ten years from the date of the maturity of the obligation of indebtedness secured or evidenced by such mortgage, or from the date to which the payment thereof has been extended by agreement of record.”

There is no agreement of record extending the time of payment of plaintiff’s note.

Section 9890 provides:

“Nothing in this act contained shall be construed to bar the foreclosure of any such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Land Board v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Day v. Celoria Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hydraulic Mining Co. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Security State Bank v. LuebkeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Title & Trust Co. v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Force v. HeusnerOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Richey Loan Co. v. CheldelinOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Lincoln Loan Co. v. Estate of George GeppertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API