Legal Opinion

Kane v. City of Flint

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1955No. Docket 14, Calendar 45,771PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

This appeal calls for construction of certain provisions in the charter and ordinances of the city of Flint. Plaintiffs, who are city firemen and policemen, brought suit against the city for additional compensation to which they claimed they were entitled, denied them by the city. Circuit Judge George B. Hartrick, presiding in Genesee county, heard the case without a jury and entered judgment of no cause for action. The plaintiffs appeal.

The Flint city charter provides for a city commission and vests in it the power to prescribe the compensation of all officers and employees of the city, as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Byrd v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. United States v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. McGuire v. City of DallasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
  4. Bowler v. NagelMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Daggett v. St. Francis Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  2. Michigan Coalition of State Employee Unions v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Satterley v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Williams v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Associated Builders & Contractors v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API