Legal Opinion
Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided February 6, 2025No. 4:22-cv-04112Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION BUERGOFOL GMBH, 4:22-CV-04112-KES Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING OMEGA’S vs. MOTION TO COMPEL BUERGOFOL TO AMEND ITS INFRINGEMENT OMEGA LINER COMPANY, INC., CONTENTIONS Defendant. Defendant, Omega, moves the court to strike plaintiff, Buergofol’s, infringement contentions and stay discovery. Docket 395; Docket 396. Buergofol opposes the motions. Docket 416. BACKGROUND On June 16, 2023, the court issued a scheduling order instructing the parties to serve infringement, non-infringement, non-validity, and validity contentions.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- View Engineering, Inc. v. Robotic Vision Systems, Inc., and Morrison Law FirmCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Niazi Licensing Corporation v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Lunsford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Shared Memory Graphics LLC v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.