Legal Opinion

Armour v. Atkins

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided September 27, 2024No. 3:20-cv-00911Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DEMETRIUS ARMOUR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 3:20-CV-911-MAB ) TAIJA ATKINS, DEE DEE ) BROOKHART, and RUSSELL GOINS, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BEATTY, Magistrate Judge: This matter is currently before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Taija Atkins, Dee Dee Brookhart, and Russell Goins (Doc. 81). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Demetrius Armour brought this civil action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Nieves v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Bridges v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Kenneth E. Gentry v. Jack R. Duckworth, Superintendent, Indiana State ReformatoryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API