Legal Opinion

Latimer v. Bard

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri

Decided October 19, 1896No. Nos. 2127-2160PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Those were actions by W. A. Latimer, receiver of the First National IBank of Sedalia, against William E. Hard, Jr., and others, stockholders in said bank, to recover the amount of an assessment made by the comptroller of the currency.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

The several cases consolidated into this action are brought by the plaintiff as receiver of the First National Bank of Sedalia, against divers persons, stockholders of said bank, to recover the amount of an assessment made by the comptroller of the currency of 75 per cent, of the stock held by them respectively. The defendants file a joint answer, setting forth in effect that the stock held by them upon which such assessment was made is part of a pretended increase of stock; that such increase was invalid and unlawful, for the reason, as alleged, that the whole amount of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Deweese v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Columbia Nat. Bank of Tacoma v. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  3. Wallace v. HoodU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1898
  4. Randall v. MickleSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Tillinghast v. BaileyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API