Tillinghast v. Bailey
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
Bill by Phillip Tillinghast, receiver, against Samuel Bailey, Jr., . and others, as stockholders in a national bank.
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, District Judge.
In the view I take of this case, I do not deem it necessary to discuss the various phases of this evidence. To do so would require much time and space. As counsel in the case are perfectly familiar with the issues, and with the evidence so far as it affects the questions to be determined, it would be of no service to do more than to state in the most general way my conclusions upon the facts disclosed by the record, and the law applicable to such facts. Two propositions are mainly relied on for the complainant, either of which, if sustained, will dispose of the case…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Bushnell v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Louisville Trust Co. v. Louisville, N. A. & C. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bennett v. WheatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Executors of Fooks v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Columbia Nat. Bank of Tacoma v. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
- Wallace v. HoodU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1898
- Allender v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.