Miller Et Ux. v. Dierken
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
In this action of ejectment plaintiffs seek the forfeiture of an oil and gas lease because of the nonpayment of the royalty provided by the lease. Plaintiffs claim title to the fee. Defendants deny that plaintiffs are the parties entitled to the royalty; they contend that they are not only assignees of the lessee, by interim assignments, but also assignees of the royalty interest, and that they are therefore entitled to indeterminate possession as long as the wells on the land produce oil or gas according to the provisions of the lease.
The pleadings consisted of a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Robinson v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Artz v. MeisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Prager's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miller Et Ux. v. DierkenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Ratajski v. West Penn Manufacturing & Supply Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Donaldson v. RitenourCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Dierken v. ShultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Duquesne Natural Gas Co. v. FefoltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.