Legal Opinion

Artz v. Meister

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1924No. Appeal, No. 118PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

Plaintiff’s action in ejectment is to recover properties located in the City of Pittsburgh, which he claims de*585fendant holds in trust for him, he having paid the purchase money and permitted title to be taken in the name of defendant, at her suggestion, upon promise to convey to him on request. The trial judge instructed the jury to render a verdict for defendant On the ground that plaintiff failed to meet the burden of establishing a resulting trust by clear, precise and indubitable evidence.

Plaintiff owned and operated a hotel in Pittsburgh and in 1893 employed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCloskey v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Adams v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Silliman v. HaasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Justice v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. McDonald v. McAndrewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Doman v. BroganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Wosche v. KraningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Hallman v. TurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Smith v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Miller Et Ux. v. DierkenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API