Legal Opinion
United States v. Halper
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 23, 1987No. 86 Civ. 2955 (RWS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
In this action brought by the United States (the “Government”) against the defendant pro se Irwin Halper (“Halper”) for the filing of allegedly inflated Medicare claims in violation of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3731, the Government has moved for summary judgment. Because Halper is collaterally estopped from denying the facts which entitle the Government to judgment in its favor, the motion for summary judgment is granted.
The following findings and conclusions are made on the affidavit, memorandum of law, and exhibits submitted by the Government, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. BornsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Berdick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- United States v. John H. Thomas, Lonnie D. Clark and John H. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Aaron Sell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Maximiliano Sanchez-Escareno, Adolpho Ayala Sanchez and David Garcia LopezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- United States v. Marcus Schloss & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Ex Parte Camara, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.