Duhamel v. Duhamel
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David D. Egan, J.
Defendant asks this court to revisit its decision in Duhamel v Duhamel (188 Misc 2d 754 [Sup Ct, Monroe County 2001]). Plaintiff opposed the application. Defendant, plaintiff’s former *101husband, originally sought postjudgment declaratory relief precluding this court from executing a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO). Defendant claimed the entry of the QDRO was time-barred under Civil Practice Law and Rules § 213 (1) and (2). Plaintiff opposed defendant’s application and cross-moved for entry of the QDRO. The court found as a matter of law that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Duhamel v. DuhamelNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- McCoy v. FeinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by2 opinions
- Duhamel v. DuhamelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re KAITLIN NICOLE WILLIAMSUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026