Legal Opinion

Duhamel v. Duhamel

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David D. Egan, J.

Defendant asks this court to revisit its decision in Duhamel v Duhamel (188 Misc 2d 754 [Sup Ct, Monroe County 2001]). Plaintiff opposed the application. Defendant, plaintiff’s former *101husband, originally sought postjudgment declaratory relief precluding this court from executing a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO). Defendant claimed the entry of the QDRO was time-barred under Civil Practice Law and Rules § 213 (1) and (2). Plaintiff opposed defendant’s application and cross-moved for entry of the QDRO. The court found as a matter of law that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Duhamel v. DuhamelNew York Supreme Court · 2001
  3. McCoy v. FeinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Duhamel v. DuhamelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re KAITLIN NICOLE WILLIAMSUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API