Legal Opinion
Duhamel v. Duhamel
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 2001PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David D. Egan, J.
This is a case of first impression. Defendant, and former husband, seeks postjudgment declaratory relief precluding this Court from executing a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO). Defendant claims the entry of the QDRO is time barred under Civil Practice Law and Rules § 213 (1) and (2). Plaintiff, and former wife, opposes defendant’s application and cross-moves for entry of the QDRO. The parties’ judgment of divorce dated December 19, 1986 granted the plaintiff a QDRO to facilitate the distribution of her interest in the marital portion of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Kaplan v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Yecies v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Edmonds v. EdmondsNew York Supreme Court · 2000
- Dolan v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bayen v. BayenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Woronoff v. WoronoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Bielecki v. BieleckiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Duhamel v. DuhamelNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- Bielecki v. BieleckiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.