Legal Opinion

Hillensbeck v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 30, 2006No. 04-1455CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL JUDGMENT REGARDING ATTORNEY FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES

BRADEN, Judge.

I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND.1

On May 17, 2001, Samantha Scott (“Plaintiff’) filed a claim against the United States (“Government”) with the Bureau of Justice Assistance (“BJA”) for survivor benefits afforded under the Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Act (“PSOBA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3796, et seq. See AR Ex. 1. On June 8, 2001, the BJA determined that Deborah Lynn Scott (“Ms. Scott”), Plaintiffs mother, was not covered under the Act and therefore, no benefits were available to her survivors. Id. Ex. 9. On…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dalles Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Geo-Seis Helicopters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Infinite Information Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  5. ACE Constructors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API