Legal Opinion

Bradford v. United States

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided February 16, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00526Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION SANTEZ BRADFORD ) ) v. ) No. 3:20-cv-00526 ) (Crim. Nos. 3:15-cr-00088-6 & UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 3:16-cr-00143-2) MEMORANDUM OPINION Santez Bradford has filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(Doc. No. 1), in which he claims his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm must be set aside based on Rehaif v. United States,

139 S. Ct. 2191

(2019). Thereafter, appointed counsel filed an Amended Motion, alleging the ineffective assistance of counsel during the plea…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API