Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Healy Const. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 31, 1922No. 2515PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is insisted by the appellant, in the several propositions, that the levy and assessment on which the certificate sued on is based is void and not enforceable for the two reasons: (1) The contract let by the city commissioners is in violation of section 2, article 4, of the charter, in that no provision is made by the city for the payment of the debt; (2) the city commissioners by the resolution or ordinance adopted and followed provided that the amount assessed and levied against each parcel of land abutting on the street should be fixed by "the front-foot plan." Whereas the charter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Lightfoot, Atty.-Gen.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. City of Corsicana v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Moore v. Commissioners' Court of Bell CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Lewis v. Roach Manigan Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Breckenridge v. Stephens CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Texas Bitulithic Co. v. WarwickTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. City of Piney Point Village v. Harris CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. City of Breckenridge v. Stephens CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Taliaferro v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API