Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Lightfoot, Atty.-Gen.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1912No. 2394PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Original application to the Supreme Court by Simmons and others for writ of mandamus against Lightfoot as Attorney-General.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibrell

This is a proceeding on the relation of the county judge and county commissioners of Liberty County, composing the Commissioners’ Court of that county, against the Attorney-General of the State to require him to give statutory certificate of approval to certain bonds for $100,000.00 authorized to be issued by said Commissioners’ Court on November 15, 1911, as road bonds of Road District No. 4 of Liberty County. Previous to the authorization of such bonds, Road District No. 4 had been properly created and established by the Commissioners’ Court of said county, and the qualified electors of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Miller v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Allman v. LumsdenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Collingsworth County v. AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. City of Breckenridge v. Stephens CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. City of Felly v. Harris County Water Control & Improvement District No. 7Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Harris County Drainage Dist. No. 12 v. City of HoustonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API