United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
2nd Trial Memorandum
In the course of the trial several occai sions have arisen where the Government objected and attempted to foreclose defendant from commenting 'on portions of writings offered in evidence by the Government. The Government contends defendant has no right either to read into the record portions of these documents or to attempt to interpret orally by ¡comment the matters therein contained. Defendant contends it has the right to malee such comment as it sees fit, especially where the matters contained in the writings appear to be adverse to the Government’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. StimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Wills v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States v. ReginelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951