Legal Opinion
Howell v. Cardinal Industries, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1993No. 17942PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
Cardinal Industries, Inc. appeals from a circuit court judgment granting Dianne Howell worker’s compensation benefits pursuant to SDCL 62-3-11. We affirm.
FACTS
Cardinal Plastics, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Cardinal Industries, Inc., a Minnesota corporation authorized to do business in the State of South Dakota. Cardinal Plastics maintains a place of business in Mobridge, South Dakota, where Howell was formerly employed.
Howell routinely rode with a co-worker, Mark Führer, during the winter of 1988-89, to and from their employment with Cardinal. Upon arriving at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Piper v. Neighborhood Youth Corps.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Meyer v. RoetteleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
- Bearshield v. City of GregorySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Krier v. Dick's Linoleum ShopSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
- Mills v. Spink Electric CooperativeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Walz v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- South Dakota Public Entity Pool for Liability v. WingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Fair v. Nash Finch Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Brady Memorial Home v. HantkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.