Legal Opinion

Reamer v. Kessler

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 22, 1964No. [No. 57, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrune, C. J.

The mortgagees under two separate chattel mortgages brought suits against the defendant, an attorney, to recover damages resulting from his negligence in certifying that the respective corporate mortgagors under these instruments liad good title to the construction equipment purportedly covered by their respective mortgages. These cases were consolidated for trial and were tried before the court without a jury. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff or plaintiffs in each case, and the defendant appeals only as to certain items included in these judgments. He does not appeal from the finding…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Carozza v. Federal Finance & Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. Lawall v. GromanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Gaver v. HarrantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Kendall v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  5. United Rental Equipment Co. v. Potts & Callahan Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Flaherty v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Mumford v. Staton, Whaley & PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Stone v. Chicago Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Keister v. TalbottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Clagett v. DacyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API