Olivo v. CRAWFORD CHEVROLET INC.
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRUCE D. BLACK, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 61). Having reviewed the submissions of the parties and the relevant law, the Court finds that Defendants’ motion should be DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.
Summary of Relevant Facts
Plaintiff Olivo worked for Defendant Crawford Chevrolet, Inc. at the Santa Fe Chevrolet car dealership as an autopainter. Plaintiff Pacheco worked for Defendant Crawford Chevrolet, Inc., at the same car dealership, as a bodyman. Defendant Crawford Chevrolet, Inc. employed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Saint Francis College v. Al-KhazrajiSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Eck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Abraham v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Corman v. JWS of N.M., Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
- Armijo v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019