Legal Opinion
Baum v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 23, 1991No. Civ. A. HAR-90-353, HAR-90-830PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HARGROVE, District Judge.
Currently pending before this Court is Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff United States of America’s (“Government”) Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, on all claims asserted against it in the above-captioned actions. Also pending is Plaintiff and Third-Party Defendant Price A. Baum (“Baum”) Motion to Dismiss Counts III and IV of the third-party complaint filed by the Government in case no. HAR-90-830. The issues have been fully briefed. No hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.).
I. FACTS:
These suits arise…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Price A. Baum Margaret Leedy v. United States v. Michael A. Massey, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Mary Carley v. Wheeled CoachCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Carney v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Mary Carley v. Wheeled CoachCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Price A. Baum Margaret Leedy v. United States v. Michael A. Massey, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993