Legal Opinion

Carney v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 2, 2005No. CCB033493PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BLAKE, District Judge.

Now pending in this admiralty case is the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs First Cause of Action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, maintaining that the plaintiffs claims are subject to the discretionary function exception in the Suits in Admiralty Act. The United States also has moved for partial summary judgment on the Second Cause of Action on the ground that it does not presently owe any maintenance or cure. Oral argument was heard on April 8, 2005. A supplemental filing was permitted but not received. For the reasons stated below, the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waverley View Investors, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  2. Carney v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API