Legal Opinion
Fonar Corp. v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 2, 1996No. 93 Civ. 2220 (CBM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
By Order dated March 27, 1996 (hereinafter “the March Order”), this court dismissed plaintiffs copyright and related state law claims for plaintiffs failure to describe its purportedly copyrighted computer software in such a way that would reveal the substance of the protected work. Subsequent to the March Order, defendants moved for costs, attorney’s fees and sanctions related to defending against plaintiffs claims and for sanctions concerning plaintiff’s improper and untimely request for reargument of the March Order. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Walpert v. JaffreyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Fonar Corp. v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- State v. GleaveDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Dubois v. US Dept, of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998