Legal Opinion
United States v. Catrell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 22, 2014No. 14-3044PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Ronald Catrell appeals his sentence, alleging: (1) a portion of the sentence illegally exceeded a statutory maximum, and (2) the Government vindictively insisted on a plea agreement recommending 132 months in prison. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. Although we find no pros-ecutorial vindictiveness here, we must reverse and remand in order for the district court to correct its imposition of an illegal sentence.
In late 2011, the Government filed an information in the District of Kansas charging Defendant with various…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Gonzalez-HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. SarracinoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. LampleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. TittiesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Corey GrantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Corey GrantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- United States v. BeckhamDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2016
- Donald v. McCray v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.