Legal Opinion

United States v. Beckham

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided August 16, 2016No. Nos. 2:09-CR-0146-LRS-1, 2:09-CR-0167-LRS-1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO VACATE SENTENCE; VACATING JUDGMENTS

LONNY R. SUKO, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

BEFORE THE COURT are Petitioner Casey D. Beckham’s Motions to Vacate his sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and with the assistance of counsel in both the above referenced cases. (ECF No. 62 in 09-146 and ECF No. 47 in 09-167). The United States as Respondent has responded in opposition (ECF No. 66). Petitioner filed a Reply (ECF No. 67), an “Amendment” to the Motion (ECF No. 68), and a Declaration re: Supplemental Authority (ECF No. 71). Oral argument was heard on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cruickshank v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
  2. Marin-Torres v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
  3. Mujahidh v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API