Legal Opinion

In re Teague

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 1988No. 8727DC1233PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

Respondent’s brief does not refer to assignments of error and exceptions pertinent to the question nor does it contain a statement of the questions for review. These are technical violations of Rules 28(b)(2) and 28(b)(5) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, which subject this appeal to dismissal. State v. Skelton, 53 N.C. App. 632, 281 S.E. 2d 684 (1981), appeal dismissed and disc. rev. denied, 305 N.C. 306, 290 S.E. 2d 707 (1982). However, because this is an important case of first impression in this state and to prevent any injustice to respondent, we will…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. In Interest of CJWSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  4. In the Interest of StormSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. In the Interest of C.P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Odom v. Little Rock & I-85 Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. In re O.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. In Re OMDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Jessica J. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API