Legal Opinion
In re O.M.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 4, 1989No. 89-320PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Appellant, a seventeen-year-old juvenile,1 brings this appeal from an order of the Superior Court directing his rendition to Alabama pursuant to the Interstate Compact on Juveniles to face delinquency charges of arson and murder. Appellant, with the strong support of the Public Defender Service as amicus, asserts five grounds in support of his contention that he cannot be returned to Alabama under the Compact. First, he contends that the Juvenile Compact, as codified in D.C.Code §§ 32-1101 through 32-1106 (1988), is only enabling legislation which authorized the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Thompson v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Speyer v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Hessey v. BurdenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In re BoyntonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Atkinson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.