Legal Opinion

Ballam v. United States

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided December 6, 1982No. Civ. A. No. 82-127-2PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEARS, District Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

On this the 1st day of December, 1982, the Court, having heard and duly considered the evidence and the arguments of counsel finds and concludes as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT(1) Plaintiff, Loy Ree Ballam, a resident of the State of South Carolina, owns real estate adjacent to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW), with a frontage thereon of approximately one hundred thirty-six (136) feet.(2) The AIWW was constructed by the defendant, United States of America, during the mid 1930’s and early 1940’s. The project authorization…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. Willow River Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Lee v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. William Eugene Owen, as of the Estate of Caroline Pearson Payne v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Loy Ree B. Marlowe Ballam v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Loy Ree B. Marlowe Ballam v. United States of America, and State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  5. Boling v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API