Loy Ree B. Marlowe Ballam v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellee Ballam brought this suit in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina under the “Little Tucker Act,” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), claiming “just compensation,” not over $10,000, for erosion of her upland, called by her a “taking” of it, resulting from waves on a portion of the inland waterway (Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway), running across it. This portion, unlike most of the waterway, is artificial, cut by the United States through her land pursuant to an easement so authorizing, granted by her predecessor-in-title in 1931 to South…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- United States v. Willow River Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kabua v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Pitman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Boling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- William Eugene Owen, as of the Estate of Caroline Pearson Payne v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Bowey v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.