Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Weiner

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 8, 1975No. 58923Published

1DissentFinch, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

In my judgment the principal opinion is in conflict with the case of In re Veach, 365 Mo. 776, 287 S.W.2d 753 (banc 1956), but it neither overrules nor even attempts to distinguish that case. The short reference in the principal opinion to Vea ch indicates a view that the cases are consistent. In my judgment they are not.

In Vea ch an information was filed against respondent which in count one charged certain professional misconduct in St. Louis and in count two alleged the suspension of respondent in Illinois by reason of various acts for which the Supreme Court of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. In Re Disbarment of IssermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. In re UlmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. In Re VeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API